Trapping method | Number of trapped animals | Adults (%) | Immature | ||
Males | Females | Males | Females | ||
Total | 201 | 34.8 | 28.8 | 19.4 | 17.0 |
Partial | 562 | 23.1 | 20.5 | 30.6 | 25.8 |
Table 2.
Age and sex structure in Grey Marmot population in different Altitude Zones
(Kokpak, 1971-1973, partial trapping)
Groups | Altitude Zones | ||
Steppe (n=634) | Forest-Meadows- Steppes (n=1625) | Alpine (n=1531) | |
Adult (%) males | 14.8±1.52 | 17.2±1.2 | 14.7±1.56 |
Reproductive females (%) | 9.0±2.3 | 11.1±1.3 | 14.0±0.7 |
Barren females (%) | 5.8±0.6 | 4.8±0.9 | 8.0±0.4 |
Yearling males (%) | 8.6±1.4 | 5.3±1.2 | 5.1±0.6 |
Yearling females | 5.7±1.0 | 9.0±1.9 | 5.7±0.2 |
Young males (%) | 27.4±2.2 | 23.2±1.7 | 24.2±1.2 |
Young females (%) | 28.8±3.3 | 29.4±3.3 | 33.5±1.7 |
Table 3.
Dynamics of age and sex structure in Grey Marmot population in the steppe and
in forest-meadow-steppe zones (Kokpak, 1968-1983, partial trapping).
Groups | Altitude Zones | |
Steppe (n=2,728) | Forest-Meadow-Steppe | |
Mature males (%) | 16.1±1.28 | 19.5±0.97 |
Reproductive females (%) | 11.1±1.13 | 11.9±0.65 |
Barren females (%) | 5.8±0.73 | 5.1±0.67 |
Yearling males (%) | 8.5±1.21 | 7.2±0.99 |
Yearling females (%) | 7.9±1.24 | 8.4±1.1 |
Young males (%) | 25.3±2.44 | 22.2±1.75 |
Young females (%) | 25.0±1.95 | 24.5±1.58 |